-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More cleanup of load.py #8
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ | |||
PARSONS_FOLDER_NAME = 'parsons_probs' | |||
PARSONS_FOLDER_PATH = './parsons_probs' | |||
PARSONS_GLOB = 'parsons_probs/*.py' | |||
PROBLEM_PATHS = [PARSONS_FOLDER_PATH] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Given this is always a list with one constant, the added complexity of its existence doesn't seem warranted.
for path in PROBLEM_PATHS: | ||
config_files.append(os.path.join(os.path.abspath(path), problem_name.lower() + ".yaml")) | ||
return load_config_file(config_files) | ||
path = os.path.join(os.path.abspath(PARSONS_FOLDER_PATH), problem_name.lower() + ".yaml") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With the recognition that there is only one path, this logic is shorter, so I combined it with the function above.
@@ -54,7 +39,9 @@ def problem_name_from_file(filename): | |||
name = func_sig[:func_sig.index('(')] | |||
return name | |||
|
|||
|
|||
def problem_name_to_file(problem_name, extension): | |||
return f'{PARSONS_FOLDER_PATH}/{problem_name.lower()}.{extension}' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's not clear to me why we use os.path.join above but just an f-string here. Is there a reason? Otherwise I'd like to standardize on one way of creating paths. I imagine os.path.join might take care of weird slash issues or some such.
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ def submit(): | |||
problem_name = request.form['problem_name'] | |||
submitted_code = request.form['submitted_code'] | |||
parsons_repr_code = request.form['parsons_repr_code'] | |||
fname = f'{PARSONS_FOLDER_PATH}/{problem_name.lower()}.py' | |||
fname = problem_name_to_file(problem_name, 'py') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I moved logic into the load file for testability (since this file is so hard to test right now, given the complexity of the okclient import).
def test_load_config_lowercased(self): | ||
with self.assertRaises(Exception) as context: | ||
load.load_config('remove_indexes') | ||
self.assertIn('remove_indexes.yaml', str(context.exception)) | ||
load.load_config("remove_indexes") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I ran the black formatter on this file so there are some whitespace/quote changes.
self.assertIn('smartfridge.yaml', str(context.exception)) | ||
self.assertIn("smartfridge.yaml", str(context.exception)) | ||
|
||
def test_problem_name_to_file(self): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The actual change is the addition of this test function.
No description provided.